| There are no upcoming events |
STORIES No new stories
COMMENTS last 48 hrs No new comments
LINKS last 2 wks No recent new links
|
|
green-horn |
|
 |
|
|
The end results only a week in the bottle but I could not wait |
|
|
|
Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User
|
| When you sign up for a Bodensatz account (see above), you'll get access to even more great content! See here for details.
|
How much do you drink a day? (Equivalent of 12 oz / 341 ml bottles)
3153 votes | 6 comments
|
|
 |
Procedures FAQ
Questions :
Answers :
- How can I improve the
quality of my beer?
> I've got a couple of kits under my belt now, and the
results
> seem pretty good so far, but still not as good as my
friend's
> beer. What can I do to improve my beer?
Here are a few things you can do to improve your beer.
Keep in mind that any one of these things taken by itself
may or may not have a noticable affect on your beer, but
as you start combining several of them, the changes in
your final product will indeed become obvious. Some of
these measures require special equipment (like perhaps a
larger pot), while others require nothing but a few more
minutes of your time. The best advice we can give is to
first do all the ones that don't require any special or
expensive equipment, and if you want to after that (and
you are sure you are going to stay with the hobby), then
invest in a few more pieces of eqiupment.
- don't use the yeast that comes with the kits, either
use a good quality dry yeast (Coopers, Muntons Gold, and the new 'Saf' products are
my favorites), or use liquid yeast
- always rehydrate your dry yeast, or make a starter if
using liquid
- learn to use some specialty grains
- learn to use hops
- do a full-volume boil (non-trivial, but makes better
beer)
- minimize use of sugar - use light or extra light malt
extract instead
Kinny Baughman has a really good page on this question,
so visit it
for more details.
- How do I reuse yeast?
It's pretty easy, actually. We outline several
methods on our yeast
page.
- Does dry yeast really
have to be rehydrated?
Well, to be absolutely literal, it doesn't
"have" to be. But it certainly should be. It's
all about general yeast health. It's tough enough for the
little guys to be dried out and then rehydrated. That's
an extreme shock to their systems. If you add a whopping
pile of sugar during the rehydration process (by putting
the yeast directly into the wort), you increase that
system-shock quite dramatically. I've also found (in
side-by-side comparisions with identical worts) that with
rehydrated yeast my fermentation takes off on average
twice as fast, which is another very positive thing you
can do for your beer.
- How do I improve the head on my beer?
> Here's one to raise a few blood pressures. Is there any practical
> benefit to having a thick creamy head on a glass of beer?? I
> poured a dunkel last week and it took four or five minutes for
> the foam to subside enough where I could get the whole bottle
> in the glass.
Depending upon your tastes, there's a huge benefit to good foam, and you just
experienced it. I always carbonate my beers and serve in
such a manner as to give me the huge, creamy foam which
takes quite a while to settle out. The benefit is purely
aesthetical and depends on the tastes of the brewer,
but personally I do it for every beer and to hell with
styles guidelines simply because that's the way I like
to drink my beer ;-) Isn't that what Homebrew is supposed
to be about, afterall?
But if you don't like a big foamy head, then don't make it that way.
Anyway, aside from that don't worry about it. If you
like the beer and want good head (on the beer ;-)), then
read up a bit on how to do that. The best way to do this is
to learn how to use Specialty Grains
and also learn to do a mini mash
with malted wheat, flaked wheat, and oats.
- Should I measure SG
without the trub?
> Also, when you measure your SG, is it appropriate to
measure it with
> the trub (and hot-break) in the fermenter. This
would give you a
> higher SG than if you racked off the trub and then
topped off to 5
> gallons, right?
Trub doesn't matter, but topping off does. Since trub
isn't dissolved, your SG is the same with or without it.
But adding that top-off water is sure going to make a
difference. But the difference is linear. So if you have
18 litres, and top off with 1 litre, you simply adjust
your SG number by multiplying by 19/18 or 18/19
(depending upon which way you want to convert).
After addition of top-up water SG will be lower than
before.
- Do I really have to
boil my kit?
> I received a can of "Morgans Blue Mountain
Lager". The instructions say to
> combine the ingredients with warm water and that
"no boiling is required".
>
> Has anyone used this method?
Although the Morgan's kits are otherwise pretty good,
their instructions can be tossed out just like most of
the other kit instructions. Instructions like this are
put on the can by marketing people who want to make their
product look as easy as possible to make.
Yes, it will make reasonably good beer if you don't boil,
but it will make better beer if you do. For kits like
Morgan's even a 5 to 10 minute good rolling boil in 10
litres (quarts) of water will be sufficient to give you a
good hot break. That means proteins in the malt extract
will coagulate together (just like when you drizzle egg
into boiling soup for eggdrop soup) and eventually settle
out of the beer before you bottle.
Getting rid of the proteins will make a clearer beer with
a cleaner taste. Since you aren't adding your own hops, a
5 to 10 minute boil is sufficient. I think it is Morgan's
which puts aroma hops into their kits, so keeping the
boil time short like this will also help preserve those
armomatics.
cheers,
-Alan
- Do specialty grains
get boiled with the malt extract?
> Should I have boiled the specialty grains with the
Malt extract?
Absolutely not! It will impart very unpleasant bitter
flavours, because oftannins in the grain husk. Specialty
grains should be steeped between 150F and 170F. Steep for
about 15 to 30 minutes, then strain out the grains. If
you get into the habit of using the temperature range of
150F to 160F, however, you can also start using malted
grains and doing mini-mashes to really add some life to
your beers.
- Can someone explain
kraeusening to me?
I thought it best to put this question to an Efriend
Hubert Hanghofer, who runs the most excellent website http://www.netbeer.co.at/beer/
(which has both English and German mirrors). Hubert's
answer follows :
> Can someone explain Krausening to me?
> One source indicates that it is the act of adding
unfermented wort
> into a almost completed batch of beer.
That's not Krausening but "Speisegabe". Speise
could be literally translated by "food" (for
the yeast), Speisegabe by "feeding".
Purpose: adjusting extract (gravity) for carbonation --
primarily for wheat beer. In Germany priming with sugar
is generally allowed only for top fermenting beers, but
with the exception of Bavaria, Wuerttemberg and Baden,
where any addition of sugar is forbidden.
> The other indicates adding actively fermenting beer
to a beer.
> which is it?
The latter! Kräusen (Kra:usen, Kraeusen) has two
meenings:
A) Rocky head during fermentation.
B) Fermenting beer at high krausen -- usually 35-45%
apparent attenuation.
So in any case it is used in conjunction with
fermentation! I've seen German texts that extend the term
Speise to include Krausen (eg. something like ...first
runnings, knock out wort or _krausen_ can be used as
Speise... ) -- seems logical, krausening is also some
kind of feeding. But I never came across a text that uses
Krausen for unfermented wort!!!
> What is the real purpose?
Fermenting beer is used in several ways like eg. pitching
with krausen etc. but I think the term krausening refers
to the German term "aufkra:usen" witch has the
same purpose as Speisegabe (carbonation). It's sometimes
prefered because the fresh yeast gives a better
attenuation. -- Note that in Germany generally an
apparent attenuation over 80% is strived for. Despite
popular believe body and full mouth feel (fullness?) are
primarily determined by the colloids (proteins) and not
unfermented or unfermentable sugars!
Hope this helps
- How much longer does
it take to brew all-grain?
> My questions are:
> a) How much longer does it take to brew all-grain?
This -is- a hobby,
> but I can't dedicate 6 hours, if that's what it
really takes.
Your first couple of times you can expect it to take as
much as 7 or 8 hours from the beginning of the day until
you have everything cleaned up and put away. I've got it
down to about 5 hours including cleanup and all. I can't
imagine it getting a whole lot shorter than that. Of
course, I brew 10 gallons at a time, and could brew 15 in
the same time. Increase your volume and you decrease your
time per volume. Also keep in mind that only about 30% of
this time do you have to actually be actively doing
stuff. The other 70% of the time involves waiting, so you
can use the time to do other stuff around the house if
you like.
- What are some
alternative ways to chill my wort?
> I keep reading about how good it is to
chill my wort as quickly
> as possible, but I can't afford an immersion or a
counterflow chiller
> right at the moment. What are some other options for
me?
Most people are already familiar with the idea of taking your hot brewpot
and immersing it into a sink (or bathtub) of cold water. Though this
does work, it isn't very efficient in that it can take quite a while to cool
the wort, even if you do regularly change the cold water.
A much better method that we developed on our own the odd time we do an extract batch is freeze a
couple of 2 litre soda bottles ahead of time. Then after
the boil I cut the plastic away from the ice and carefully lower the
ice right into the kettle. BE REALLY CAREFUL ABOUT DOING THIS THOUGH, AS YOU CAN SPLASH BOILING
WORT ONTO YOU. We find the best way is to put the block of ice
into a large grain bag and hold the end of it to lower the ice into the
water.
Our extract batches are usually brewed with about 10 litres of water in the pot.
So obviously to do this you are going to need about a 20
litre (20 quart) pot. But it works like a charm. In the
time it takes the ice to melt (10 minutes) it brings the
pot contents down below 100F. Then when we add cold water
to it in the carboy, we're already down to fermentation
temp. All it takes is 2 x 2 litre soda bottles.
It works like a charm. Just make sure those soda
bottles are well cleaned and sanitized on the
inside. Be careful putting the ice in, and also
be careful cutting the plastic off the ice. As soon as
you get a good sized cut in the plastic, the pressure
differential caused by the cut will cause the ice to
crack violently, making a huge noise that will likely
scare the pants off you if you don't know to expect it.
I'd wear eye protection when doing this, since a piece of
ice could conceivably fly off during that cracking, and
could take your eye out.
cheers,
-Alan
- Which chiller is
best, a counter-flow (CF), or an immersion?
We've already got a page dedicated to this question, so
please refer to it.
- How can I increase my
extract efficiency while mashing?
> What tips would you have to increase one's mashing
efficiency? Mine is
> around 70% and I'd like to improve it a little.
See my mashing pages for more
info. Mashout helps quite a bit, as does George Fix's
40/60/70 schedule (do a search on http://www.hbd.org/hbd/).
The latter there is a bit much for me personally, as I
prefer single infusion mashing. If you can mash out,
though, do so. I noticed huge increases in extraction
efficiency when I added a mashout to my schedule. Also,
make sure your sparge water is kept high (170F) and not
allowed to vary in either direction by more than 3F . If
you can get your sparge water pH to the 5.5 to 6.0 range,
you'll help yourself out a bit, as well.
What kind of lauter-tun are you using? This is important,
too. Especially the straining mechanism you use. I got
better performance in my system moving from an EC-masher to a
manifold, then again moving from the manifold to a false
bottom.
Remember that as with many aspects of brewing, each
little thing by itself may not win you much, but put them
all together and they add up.
- What's the best way
to carbonate my keg?
- How much corn sugar do I use to carbonate my keg?
> I've been reading a lot about kegging, but
there seems to be a lot of
> very different recommendations on carbonating. Some
use DME, others
> use Corn Sugar, and still others use their CO2
tanks. I also see varying
> reports on just how much sugar to use.
Well, all of those will get your beer carbonated sooner
or later. Let's take the last question first : if you are
priming with corn sugar (or DME for that matter) use the
exact same amount that you would use if you were
bottling. We see a lot of people who recommend using only
1/3 the amount, and frankly, we'd like to choke the
person (whoever it is) who originally started this myth.
There is nothing magical about a keg which means you need
less sugar. A volume of beer is a volume of beer, no
matter how you slice and dice it. So use 125g (3/4 cup)
plus or minus according to your own tastes.
The big question here is : why use corn sugar or DME to
prime in the first place? This provides food for the
yeast, which causes them to multiply and eventually flocc
out, causing sediment in your keg. To us that just seems
to be defeating part of the whole purpose of having kegs
in the first place : sediment free homebrew! Yes, you can
simply drain the first glass or two and pour it out, but
that's wasteful in our eyes.
If you are patient, simply affix the CO2 and set it
according to the temperature of the keg, and the amount
of CO2 you want in the beer. This is one of the few
things we don't yet cover on our pages, but you can go
here for more information, and visit our kegging
page for more details on using your CO2 tank to carb
your beer.
- When during the mash
should I check my pH?
- What are the best pH papers to use?
> I'm getting ready to brew my first all grain batch.
> 1) Should I just check the PH of the water prior to
mashing or should I
> check it during the mash?
First of all, if it's your first all grain then forget
the pH. Or at most measure it only for your records.
Don't waste money on a pH meter you may never use again -
at this point you may yet discover that mashing isn't for
you. But realistically, pH papers are fine. Don't waste
your money on a meter at all.
If you really want to, then check the pH both of the
water prior to the mash, and of the mash itself. Also
check your sparge water pH, especially if you treat it
with some sort of acid.. I check mine every time, and
only seldom does the pH fall out of ideal. Even then it's
still well within the range considered acceptible. But I
still check it anyway, mainly for my records.
Realistically if it is your first mash you won't know
what to do about an off pH anyway. I've been mashing for
3 years now and can't say I'd know what to do if some of
the readings I regularly take didn't fall in the right
place (which they always fall into). That's a bit of an
exaggeration. I'd know where to go look up what to do,
but I wouldn't know off the top of my head.
> My concern here is that the meter says it has
> a range of 32F to 122F.
Um, then why did you buy it?
> I was not going to use PH papers since I heard MANY
complaints ranging
> from 'completely useless' to "very hard to
read" especially with
> darker beers.
That's common for the pH papers made out of paper. But if
you get the plastic strips (like the Mercks ColorpHast
that everyone here talks about) this problem majically
disappears.The paper ones soak up water which throws of
the reading. Plastic doesn't soak up water. The only
potential problem with the papers is if you are
colorblind. I am a bit, and sometimes I have trouble
reading them, depending upon the lighting.
cheers,
-Alan
- Has anyone experimented with using dry ice to pressurize bottles
without any sediment?
Now there's something I've never heard of before. However, a guy in
a former brew
club we were in was a chemistry professor at the University who does a lot of similar
stuff with dry ice, so I put the question to him.
He puts on shows for local highschools where he puts a
small piece of dry ice into a plastic soda bottle with a bit of water, then caps
it. The thing explodes quite impressively.
Moral: dry ice can be extremely dangerous and we strongly
discourage you from trying to do this!
Reply From the Chem Prof Scott
If I understood your question clearly, you should use 0.58 cm^3 or 0.92g of dry
ice to produce 500mL of nonpressurized CO2. Careful, a mistake and you've made
yourself a bomb!...but let me come and watch :-)
our comment to that
Since according to Mark
Hibbert "green beer" already contains about 0.90 volumes of CO2 at
20C (please check his tables for other temperatures, as it varies dramatically),
then we'd obviously need about 1 to 1.5 grams of dry ice to carbonate 500ml of
beer.
However - and here's the cincher - under normal conditions carbonation forms
very slowly in beer over a period of a week or more. Because it happens so
slowly, the beer is able to absorb the carbonation which is produced. If
you tried the trick with dry ice - even if you did put in the proper amount - it
would release the entire amount of carbonation in only a few seconds. This
would almost definitely cause a very violent explosion, so please do not try
this!
Last Updated 2003.12.23 @ 11:45 Edit |
|